“How
do we continue to teach fundamentals to an increasingly diverse team in skill
and experience?” – Kennedy
Kennedy
presents a real issue facing BMU. If the
team wants to continue to market itself as a place that is fundamentals
focused, how do you balance the fundamentals work that younger players need
while also challenging your top end? I
think Kennedy’s concerns are directly related to Mihaly
Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of “flow”.
BMU takes everyone who shows up. It is usually around 40-60 people at a
practice. The bottom 10 struggles to
complete flicks in partner passing, the top 10 struggle to quickly turn
catching an incut into throwing downfield.
If we target the bottom of the roster then the top group will be in the
boredom space, if we target the top group then the bottom will be pushed into
the anxiety space.
As a preface I want to clearly take a stance against
trying to split the talent into different drills and challenging the better
players with more difficult drills. Just
as a low-income child who attends school with high-income students is more
likely to succeed than a low-income child who attends a purely low-income
school, those who are bad at Frisbee will struggle to succeed without given the
chance to mix in with good players.
If we look at this issue specifically through the Black
Market lens the road forward is obvious.
We focused on fundamentals, but only on a piece of fundamentals. The entire season was heavily weighted toward
being able to hit resets and complete “possession” passes. We barely scratched the surface of breaking
the mark and hucking.
There are fundamentals outside of throwing that BMU
severely neglected. Our defensive
foundation was poor (as evident by our near inability to guard the other team’s
best players and to consistently pressure incuts), we had bad marks, and we
struggled with handlers that used their legs.
Offensively we struggled to get open and we cleared poorly.
Black Market can change the weighting of practices toward
a lot of 1v1 cutting, we can break down defensive footwork, we can constantly
drill spacing, and we can do a marking drill every day. All of these ideas were addressed at some
point during our season, but most were only discussed once. If we want our team to be good at something
then we need to drill it every practice, or at least every week. We worked on possession passes every day,
what if we moved to a different part of the game.
Great but maybe we feel like owning possession passes is
the best use of our time and we want to continue to keep that is the
focus. (Spoiler alert: it is). Now we have to confront the issue of
challenging people within the same fundamental umbrella. My theoretical solution to this issue – no matter how good you are there is always something
you can get out of a drill.
Take a drill like the one below:
This is a brutally simple drill. It can be learned just by following someone
who knows what they’re doing. There are
lines at each blue dot, when you get to the front of one of the lines you run
an out-and-in catch a pass and throw it to the person who is making an out-and-in
in front of you, then you get in the back of the other line and repeat.
If you’re bad what are the things you can worry about? Catching the disc and throwing it towards the
receiver are very worthwhile focuses.
If you’re okay what could you worry about? Running through the disc, getting balanced on
each throw, and trying to hit the outside shoulder of your receiver can make
you better.
If you’re good what could you worry about? Accelerate through the disc, catch one
handed, catch every terrible pass, reduce the time it takes you to ready a
throw, work on throw and go footwork, throw every pass softly, get as much spin
as you can without throwing it hard, make the disc sit. All of these ideas are just focusing in on
the moment of catching and throwing.
What if you brought your attention on the out-and-in? You could work on driving a hard cut, keeping
the cut at an acute angle and the footwork involved, and accelerating out of
the cut.
As I go up the skill axis I find more and more things to
work on. This is why I like to use
Zubair’s progressive drill idea. Take a
simple drill like the one above, and as a coach/captain outline an incredibly
rudimentary goal for the drill.
1.
Instead of starting with an out-and-in you could just
stand and jog at the disc, after catching come to a complete stop, and then
deliver the pass.
2.
Turn up the speed at which you run at the disc.
3.
Add the out-and-in.
4.
Dictate the side of the receiver you throw to.
5.
Dictate how the catch should be made.
6.
Push people to accelerate through the disc.
7.
Add a defender to get physical on the out-and-in portion.
As you add complicating factors your better players should
become challenged and more engaged. At some
point you will end up leaving the worse players behind. However, with the right guidance you can cue them to ignore the more advanced cues and just stay on the focuses that put
them into flow.
How do you mesh your low-income student analogy with splitting your college team into a and b team practices starting in winter? After you answer that, how do you mesh it with BMUs decision to keep practices open?
ReplyDeleteI suspect your answer will be that the top 10 on BMU (and everyone not on machine) haven't graduated to doing more than the basics. Is it anything more than that?
As far as the progressive drill, I think this is a very productive process for even very good players. It's particularly frustrating to watch a team launch into a drill at full speed with defenders only to lose the entire purpose in 1v1 competition of winning the drill.