Handler Defense:
1. Upline Sprint
a.
Use
three cones to outline the path of an upline (call them a-b-c)
b.
Dictate
to the offense that they are just going to spring along the path (a-b-c)
c.
Defense
is trying to just keep up with them
I
am pretty sure this is step one. A young
defender needs to learn how fast he has to move in order to cover an
upline. I have a freshman right now who
stands up straight and just lets the offense blow right past them, and then he
jogs after them. He would probably make
the A team if he could play handler defense, but at this point he has no
appreciation for what he needs to do just to cover the initial strike
upline.
2. Upline and back
a.
Same
three cones
b.
Dictate
that the offense is going to just run upline and then cut back (a-b-c-b)
i.
Cutter
doesn’t have to go all the way toward c – just ensure he drives hard toward it
c.
Defense
is just trying to get in front of the upline and then trying to get back on the
around
After
you convince them to cover the uplines you have to convince them to pursue the
arounds.
3. Upline option
a.
Same
three cones
b.
Offense
is allowed to either run a hard upline (a-b-c) or a hard up and back (a-b-c-b)
i.
Nothing
in between, no stutter steps, no jukes
ii.
Offense
needs to pick which one they’re running before they get into it
c.
Defense
has to be reactive to two options
Take
them out of the comfort of knowing what’s coming. This teaches them the perils of overpursuing.
4. Uplines – no rules
a.
Take
the cones and the rules away from the offense
i.
All
juking/stuttering/shimmies are allowed
b.
Defense
has to be reactive
Game
like reps
Last
year alumni weekend the Illinois kids were complaining about a rookie who
couldn’t play defense. Brad whispered to
me, “they complain about him, but have they even tried to teach him how to play
defense?” I referenced earlier a
freshman that I have this year, NUT has already complained about his ability to
play handler defense. They call him
lazy, but we haven’t taught him how to play handler defense yet so who does the
blame really fall on?
Coaching Cues:
Reds
are on offense. The star has the disc
and is trying to score going up the page, she is being forced forehand.
- As a defender she wants to triangulate so that she can see
both the disc and her girl.
- A major part of this is going
to be working to maintain her triangle
- The offense can “break” her
triangle by getting on her back and forcing her to turn to face guard.
- She can set her eyes towards
this space so that she can see both the disc and the girl in her
peripherals.
- This is the “upline” space
- It is not the end of the
world to get beat here
- If as a defender she can
stay between her girl and the endzone (the endzone up the page) then she
will have effectively “capped” their upline and taken away the power
position
- Under cutting the upline
and trying to lay it out is definitely a risk she wants to take!
- Another option and probably
the best option is eliminating the dump from being an option by allowing them
to go upline, but staying close enough that the thrower never even thinks
about throwing it. This forces the offense to go to their next option
which lowers their completion percentage drastically.
- This is the “around” space
- It is important to
prioritize “capping” this movement over trying to undercut it for a d
i.
Compare
this to the upline space where I say undercutting is a worthwhile gamble,
undercutting here is not worthwhile! -
Just cap the throw
- The general rule is she is
not allowed to commit to getting a D on around throws until the disc is
in the air. When the disc is release she has to make a quick read if she
can get the d or not. Most of the time she can’t. If she can’t the focus
immediately has to switch to containing/capping the around. She cannot
let them continue to throw to the breakside.
The Defender's Back:
could you clarify what you mean when you say "getting on her back" in reference to the handler breaking the triangulation? I think you say it in some of your other posts as well and I'm not really sure what you mean
ReplyDeleteI added an image to the post in order to help. By "getting the defender's back" I mean if the offense can get to a spot where either (1) the defense has to turn and face guard them or (2) the defense has to face the disc without seeing the cutter then the offense has gained the advantage
ReplyDeleteSo, you are going to lose this position sometimes and be forced to face guard. I think it's good to point out that at this point you have to face guard, don't play D with your back to the cutter. However, people give up power position very regularly from this position - It's because they face guard with their back to their own endzone, and are still giving up space '3'. I cue my guys to try to play with their back to the upline space '3' if they get turned around, so that if a disc goes up they'll be in a better position to challenge it. Thoughts?
ReplyDeleteAgreed that when you lose the positioning battle you have to face guard.
ReplyDeleteDisagree on starting with your back to 3. It's possible I am misunderstanding you, but if my guy's is to three and an immediate swing goes off I don't think he will be able to see it well enough in order to be able to challenge it. I also think lining up in this way sets them up to have to face guard more. This discussion would probably be better in real life.
Sure, just a clarification, I meant only when forced into a face guarding situation. I teach the same starting point and positioning and goals. I think players get turned around or lose that good starting position often enough that it's worth working on a strategy for recovering.
ReplyDelete